Stan Halpin wrote: >A comment on the new Canon, plucked from DPReview: > >> -The 6D is proof that Canon doesn't have the R&D to keep up with the >> competition. -Canon simply went to its parts bin and threw a bunch of newer >> and older tech together to make this camera. >> -They have the gall to give us YET again that ancient AF??? >> -And then they price it at the same price as the D600, even with lower pixel >> count??? >> The 6D is nothing but a hastily thrown together desperate attempt by an >> arrogant company that didn't see the D600 coming. > >It seems that others also have a love/hate relationship with their toy makers.
I've seen (but not read) threads comparing the AF between the K-5 and K-5II and between the K-5IIs (no AA filter)and a 24 megapixel camera with an AA filter... even though the camera itself isn't available for anyone to do the comparison yet. In fact, I've seen far stupider threads there. Some people are way beyond pixel-peeping, they've started peeping at pixels that don't even exist yet. That's why I rarely post there. Too easy to get sucked into the stupidity vortex. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
