On 10/3/2012 2:49 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: David Mann
On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:14 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]>
wrote:
Ah yes, the incredible shrinking Kodak. A case study in why all
MBA holders should be burned at the stake. A million plans and
nary a clue.
I wonder if their genius executive is cutting the money-losing
printers to focus on ink sales, not realising that the ink is useless
without the printers.
Cheers, Davebert
No one buy's ink refills for low cost printers. It's cheaper to trash
the printer and buy a new one.
Sadly it really is. in fact even if you like the printer you're using
it's often cheaper to find a printer that uses the same inkset that
your's uses and take the inks and trash the new printer...
This plan of Kodak's might make sense if they were offering better than
OEM inksets for /other/ manufactures printers for bargain prices.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
