I thought of that, having just recently used the OIS Lumix 45-200 on my IBIS E-PM1. (You can get the E-PM1 body now for under $200) As per urban legend, I turned off the IBIS and left the OIS on.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, interesting. I wonder if he knows that you can compare the difference > between Optical and In camera stabilization by mounting a 4:3 Panasonic > stabilized lens, (or m4:3 if you prefer to use them), on an Olympus 4:3 > body? Hum, I guess not. > > I'm always amazed by experts who don't seem to know very much, how did they > get to be experts is there a test? > > He does make pretty charts, maybe that's his area of expertise. This isn't > earth shattering, in fact his results mirror the general perceived wisdom. > > Olympus by the way is supposed to have a much much improved in body > stabilization in the OM-D. Maybe someone will test it vs a Panasonic > stabilized lens. > > I expect that the K-3, or whatever the heck it will be called, will have > much improved in body stabilization, because they'll have > > > > On 10/23/2012 5:15 PM, Brian Walters wrote: >> >> Interesting article that uses a K-5 and a Sigma 50-500 mm HSM lens. The >> article doesn't say what focal length was used in the tests but presumably >> it was the long end. >> >> >> http://www.digitalversus.com/digital-camera/image-stabilisers-optical-mechanical-a1608.html >> >> >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a > lengthly search. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
