I'm always amazed by experts who don't seem to know very much, how did
they get to be experts is there a test?
All they have to do is be more than 50 miles from home.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "P. J. Alling" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Comparing in-body and lens-based image stabilisation
Well, interesting. I wonder if he knows that you can compare the
difference between Optical and In camera stabilization by mounting a 4:3
Panasonic stabilized lens, (or m4:3 if you prefer to use them), on an
Olympus 4:3 body? Hum, I guess not.
I'm always amazed by experts who don't seem to know very much, how did
they get to be experts is there a test?
He does make pretty charts, maybe that's his area of expertise. This isn't
earth shattering, in fact his results mirror the general perceived wisdom.
Olympus by the way is supposed to have a much much improved in body
stabilization in the OM-D. Maybe someone will test it vs a Panasonic
stabilized lens.
I expect that the K-3, or whatever the heck it will be called, will have
much improved in body stabilization, because they'll have
On 10/23/2012 5:15 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Interesting article that uses a K-5 and a Sigma 50-500 mm HSM lens. The
article doesn't say what focal length was used in the tests but
presumably it was the long end.
http://www.digitalversus.com/digital-camera/image-stabilisers-optical-mechanical-a1608.html
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid
a lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
