Krisjanis Linkevics Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:20:18 -0800:

> Let me rehash my point. The 50 f/1.2 is nice. Very nice. But they are only 
> manual focus and you wouldn't be able to casually focus it at f/1.2 in low 
> light anyway. Unless your eyesight, hand-eye coordination and viewfinder 
> precision are well above average and/or you use static targets. And if 
> sharp-ish eyes and blurry nose/ears is your thing or you are not going to use 
> it at f/1.2 at tight portrait distances.

Granted. The 50/1.2 is not an easy lens to master - but there are images where 
the narrow DOF and creamy OOF areas are desirable and worth the effort IMO.
However, the low-light advantage is very slim and not of much value given the
excellent high-ISO performance of today's DSLRs 

> The going rate for the FA50 is less than half of the various 50/1.2. You get 
> a 
> little more real "extra light" over the f/1.7 and autofocus for that. I would 
> get the FA50/1.4 right away if my f/1.7 wasn't autofocus or if I had a buyer 
> for it.

If it is an "either/or" choice I would agree. But some of us are fortunate 
enough to 
be able to afford both; granted, the OP is probably not be in that position.

> I never made any comments about 50/1.2 being inferior to other 50s at f/4 or 
> anything to that effect. I said it was nice, what more do you want? :)
> It is, however, a "specialty" lens with an appropriate price tag.

I felt that you were damning the 50/1.2 with faint praise and wanted to make it 
plain 
that this lens has its own special virtues (at least in my eyes). If this was 
not your 
intent, I'm sorry I jumped to that conclusion. Yes, it's a specialty lens and 
some 
(perhaps most) will not be attracted to what it has to offer. However, I find 
it that it 
has its charms.

As I concluded in my earlier reply, YMMV...

> The reaction from the non-photographer members of my family when showing them 
> kids pictures made at f/1.2 has always been "This is nice and all, but if 
> only 
> you had used a real lens, we would have decent pictures now". Yes, apparently 
> I 
> aim to start a holy f/1.2 war here.

No "war," just a difference in opinion based on a different scale of values. ;<)

Regards, Jim

********************************************************************************************
"It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities 
are wrong." 

-  Voltaire


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to