Have to agree. The 60-250, my most used lens, is a keeper. The 16-50 would be hard to part with as well.
Paul via phone On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:19 PM, John Francis <jo...@panix.com> wrote: > > What is this "parting with lenses" of which you speak? > > Currently I don't see any way I'd let the 60-250 get away from me, > and even though I haven't used it in a couple of years I hope that > I don't need to reclaim the equity tied up in the 250-600. > > But while five years ago I wouldn't have considered getting rid of > the FA* 80-200, I haven't used it since I got the 60-250 (and even > before that the 50-135 had all but supplanted it). > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
