Yes, I know there is not so much difference overall, compared to the plain
K-5, but the improvements in AF (both its precision with tungsten light and
its much extended sensitivity to low light) make a huge difference for me
and the kind of pics I shoot.
As per the difference between K-5II and K-5IIs, in most cases the sharpness
is the same (other factors such as minimal motion blur and subtle difference
in focusing being more important than AA filter or not). However, when all
winds blow in favor, the difference is more than noticeable.
Moiré? After 3,000 shots with the K-5IIs, I spotted it only twice. One was a
grid of an air conditioner (lost in the distance on a balcony within a
cityscape) and another one was a fabric in a still life I setup on purpose
to generate moiré. Not a big problem for me.
This I wanted to share before sinking into lurk mode because I am late with
deadlines at work.
Cheers,
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
