Not on meds. Just in pain (at least was last night when I posted this). Much better today now that ankle is in cast.
;-) cheers, frank On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Kenneth Waller <[email protected]> wrote: > it appears your medication has kicked in! > > -----Original Message----- >>From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: Kid pictures (was Re: PESO: Concentration) >> >>If parents don't want their kids photographed in public places they could >>dress them in little burkas. >> >>They could make "Western burkas": like Spiderman or Star Wars for boys, >>Barbie or My Little Pony for the girls. >> >>One could do a Christian motif: cover it in crucifixes or maybe a beard and >>crown of thorns. Different religions could use their own symbology. Cover up >>your child and indoctrinate all at once! >> >>And think of the sports team licensing opportunities here! >> >>Your kid will look cool ~and~ be protected from photographers and other pesky >>predators. >> >>With the right marketing this could take off... >> >>Cheers, >>frank >> >> >> >>--- Original Message --- >> >>From: John Sessoms <[email protected]> >>Sent: February 19, 2013 2/19/13 >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Kid pictures (was Re: PESO: Concentration) >> >>From: Igor Roshchin >>> Tue Feb 19 08:50:32 EST 2013 >>> John Sessoms wrote: >>> >>>> From: Larry Colen >>>>> On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm going to hijack your post in a slightly different direction. >>>>>> My sibling has been rather adamant about not posting photos of zir >>>>>> child in public places. What do other people think about that >>>>>> attitude? >>>>> >>>>> I think that parents should have the right to say whether pictures of >>>>> their kids can be posted. >>>> >>>> >>>> That sounds an awful lot like giving "parents" an absolute veto over >>>> what you can photograph. It's not very far from there to "You can't take >>>> photographs here because there are children present." >>> >>> John, >>> >>> There are constitunational (or otherwise legal) right, and there is what >>> is right (and/or ethical) with a kid. >> >>I don't photograph kids until I have a signed contract and the parents >>pay me a lot of money. >> >>But if I am in a public location, going about my own business, it is >>parents responsibility to keep their kids out of my way. It is *not* >>their right to tell me I can't engage in my lawful occupation because >>they cannot or will not control their spawn. >> >>I've had problems before where I was working, somebody's kid intruded >>into my frame & the parents hassled me about it. >> >>I really don't like that. > . > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
