On 2/21/2013 9:57 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Ah-ha -- turns out the K-30 has a delay in displaying focus peaking (about half a second after focusing), so that's why I didn't see it earlier (because I was rushing it a bit).
Well, that is good to know. I haven't paid any attention to the K-30 but hopefully this means that future Pentax Ricoh dslr's will have focus peaking. WOuld be a great boon IMO.

What I do is flower porn, and you can't get a decent shot of something
above your head without a tilting screen (or a down-shot above shoulder
height).  Down near the ground makes a huge difference, too, if you're
shooting sideways.
Bring a ladder :-)

Gotcha. That does make the K-01 a little more tempting. I like TAv because I want to control shutter/aperture without thinking. I spent yesterday afternoon with a professional photographer [*], and he made a 13x20 print (on 17x22 paper) of a K-5 shot I took at ISO 6400 because he wanted to see how much camera sensors have changed over the last few years. You literally can't see any noise (partly because the glossy paper itself is a bit stippled). There's just no reason to pay much attention to ISO.

I agree that senors and processing has come a long way, but I would not agree that there is no reason to pay attention to ISO. While noise is remarkably restrained at higher ISO's it is still there. If I want it there that's great (I do still use Rodinal and film, after all), if it is a necessary compromise I can live with that, but if I can get the shot without it I will. I shoot snow crystals at ISO 100 or 200 simply because the noise of higher ISO's would be a distraction. There is not enough visual "stuff" (signal) to counter the noise. I can see the difference between ISO 400 and 800 for birds and bugs, but would not hesitate to go to ISO 800 to get a shutter speed fast enough to freeze the subject. But I would be very reluctant to shoot nature stuff above ISO 800, even with the K-5.

Mark

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to