For me, one of the reasons for my photography is the end result - the image. The process to get there for me is both a mechanical and a creative process. While other camera brands are available, the process would stil be the same, but I 'd have to adapt to the new brand uniqueness and that would take away from the creative process. So staying with a given brand lets me concentrate more on the creative process. Not to say I couldn't eventually learn the new brand - this and the fact that I've got a significant chuck of change in my Pentax equipment and I just don' t see other brands being enticing enough to make the switch.
YMMV -----Original Message----- >From: John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> >Subject: Re: OT in defense of changing gear > >From: Rob Studdert >> On 24 February 2013 12:21, Ann Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: >> >>> Isn't that what this guy's point was, actually? >>> (I just read the quote below , not the blog) >> >> I read the blog and to be honest I'm not sure what his point is. Mine >> is just that familiarity with the equipment allows you to make a >> greater part of your picture taking the creative component. >> >> Cheers, > >I read it through it several times and I'm still not sure I understand, >but ... > >I think he's bored with the way he's doing things and wants to change >up, yet he's finding it hard to break his established "rules" because >they work. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
