On Feb 27, 2013, at 14:56 , Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
> Charles Robinson wrote: > >> On Feb 27, 2013, at 14:42 , Walt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How good a lens is the FA 28/2.8? >>> >>> If it's good, it might make it a goal. I could use a wider-angle AF prime, >>> and that seems like a realistic semi-near-term possibility. >>> >> >> I've got the "A" which I think is the same optical formula. >> >> I'd rate it "fine". Not as nice (although wider) as the DA35 f/2.4 though, >> in my experience. > > According to Boz and other sources, the A, F and FA 28mm/2.8 lenses > are all different designs. The FA is generally regarded as the best of > them, though. (The K 28/3.5 and M 28/3.5 are even better) > Huh. Well shut my mouth... thanks Mark. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [email protected] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
