Its 1:2. Says so right on the barrel in his sample pics. Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 16 March 2013 05:55, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >> Not me. No way I'd pay over 5K for a lens that someone had cobbled to >fit a different mount. And the Sigma that he wants $1100 for? It sells >for $800 brand new at Amazon. > >I don't know why the seller descibes the Leica lens as a macro, Leica >certainly doesn't and at the highest reproduction ratio: 1:6.7 who >would. Nice lens though. > >-- >Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) >Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours >Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
