Whoops. I didn't think of that. Yeah, this doesn't look so hot anymore. Not that it was a practical idea or anything. I could buy a ton of awesome lenses for five grand. Or maybe a handful of real gems. Either way.
Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >Rob Studdert wrote: > >>On 16 March 2013 05:55, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> >wrote: >>> Not me. No way I'd pay over 5K for a lens that someone had cobbled >to fit a different mount. And the Sigma that he wants $1100 for? It >sells for $800 brand new at Amazon. >> >>I don't know why the seller descibes the Leica lens as a macro, Leica >>certainly doesn't and at the highest reproduction ratio: 1:6.7 who >>would. Nice lens though. > >Yep. The seller even states that the minimum focusing distance of the >lens is 1.5 meters (or 5 feet). That's nowhere near macro with a 180mm >lens. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
