Tue Apr 9 11:06:52 EDT 2013 Paul Stenquist wrote: > On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Bruce Walker <bruce.walker at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Police called in to defuse a dangerous solargraphy camera. Now looking > > for photographer to charge ... > > > > http://petapixel.com/2013/04/08/bomb-squad-called-to-bridge-to-deal-with-a-solargraphy-pinhole-camera/ > > > > Hint to bomb-makers: clearly mark your package as a harmless pinhole > > camera. ;-) > > It's unfortunate that we live in a world where any package left behind can be > suspect. But attaching one's pinhole am era to a bridge support is probably > not a very intelligent choice.
I agree with you, Paul on both accounts. I don't see how labeling it and providing the contact information would help: What is the bad guy would do that? Would they treat the object with less suspicion? _That_ wouldn't make sense. Yes, they can try to contact the "owner", using the contact information. But that may be bogus, or the phone number may be linked to a disposable phone tied up to the activation mechanism... [Oops, now, if somebody does that, I will be in trouble for describing such a scenario on the internet! Hold on, somebody is knocking on the door.. ] ;-) Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
