>> That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light >> photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon >> A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue >> that it's capable, I suppose, but that smells of "wrong question").
> Really? > You show me one camera that cannot produce a pleasing image and I'll > show you a million that are. I wasn't referring to a specific use for a specific camera. I was speaking in general terms, that being, any camera is capable of producing a pleasing and decent image, unless it's downright defective. Tom C. On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> >> >>> I should add, following the line of thought, that any/every camera is >>> capable in the hands of one who knows how to best use it. > >> That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light >> photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon >> A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue >> that it's capable, I suppose, but that smells of "wrong question"). > > Really? > > You show me one camera that cannot produce a pleasing image and I'll > show you a million that are. > > Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
