On 14/04/2013 12:14 AM, Tom C wrote:
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon
A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue
that it's capable, I suppose, but that smells of "wrong question").
Really?
You show me one camera that cannot produce a pleasing image and I'll
show you a million that are.
I wasn't referring to a specific use for a specific camera. I was
speaking in general terms, that being, any camera is capable of
producing a pleasing and decent image, unless it's downright
defective.
Tom C.
I fully understand Aahz's "no camera is good if you hate to use it"
comment. The camera my be fine, but if it's ergonomics are getting in
the way of the user, or even if it's just butt ugly and is missing key
components (the Pentax K-01 for example), it's not going to be something
the photographer wants to use.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
