There wasn't much post processing but some was done, this also isn't a DSLR but one of those Macvia jobs.
--- Len Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This can be a result of in-camera processing. Pro > and pro-sumer > digitals usually give quite a bit of control over > that. > Allowing us to not use in-camera processing. It > also could be > the result of certain picture editing software. Do > you know for > sure that this wasn't the result of post-camera > processing? > > I've never noticed a lack of texture detail in my > own digital > images. > > Len > --- > > > I just saw a few pics from the latest Sony Digi > cam > > that our marketing dept aquired and I must say the > > pictures look very good. I do have to add tho that > the > > 16x20" prints are sharp and have no percievable > grain > > or artifating to them at all BUT there is no > detail in > > textures. This is what it seems makes these > digital > > pictures look so good, a wall that has many fine > > cracks and surface imperfections is just a flat > non > > textured wall, skin blemishes and wrinkles are > gone, > > goose bumbs are not visible. The pictures still > look > > very impressive despite the loss of all fine > detail > > especially from 2-3 ft away. This is what people > seem > > to want and like about digital it seems, they > don't > > want to see the fine detail and minute > imperfections > > but even tones and smooth surfaces. > - > ______________________________________________________________________ File your taxes online! http://taxes.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
