On 5/18/2013 2:47 PM, Walt wrote:
On 5/18/2013 1:40 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On 5/18/13 2:39 PM, Walt wrote:
On 5/18/2013 1:31 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, J.C. O'Connell <[email protected]>
wrote:
all of these focal lengths out of whack is due to aps-c cropping.
Just
another good reason for Pentax to put out a FF dslr body!
But they went to some trouble to create an entire lineup of DA lenses
with adjusted focal lengths instead. So 16-50 ~= old 24-70, 50-135 ~=
old 70-200, DA*55 is the de facto portrait lens, etc.
For those many of us starting out with a blank slate on APS-C, the
Pentax bodies together with the DA and DA* lineup makes perfect sense.
It's just those legacy lenses that don't fit so well. :-)
--
-bmw
I reckon one of the few benefits of not having taken up photography
until well into the digital age is that I don't know any of this stuff.
-- Walt
also means you can go about the business of making pictures without
all the teeth-gnashing over what is and isn't.
Precisely. It really helps that I don't have any idea what the FOV of
a 50mm is "supposed" to be.
-- Walt
The FOV of a 50mm is short telephoto on either 35mm film or APS-C
digital, it's just more of a Telephoto on APS-C. The "normal" lens by
convention on 35mm would be about 42.5mm the diagonal of the film,
"normal" for APS-C would be about 29mm so, you know, you can do what you
want. Mini cams have been breaking the rules since Barnack invented the
Leica.
--
There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive
failure, and those that will.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.