On 20 May 2013 12:22, J.C. O'Connell <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree with one point made below. FF actually allows LOWER quality > lenses to be > used because the absolute lines/mm doesnt have to be as high for same > quality of > results. Yes with some really bad lenses the softness in the corners may > become more > visible, but with decent lenses, FF puts less emphisis on lens quality than > apsc does.....
The problem is twofold, firstly obviously lens quality falls off towards the edges so many lenses that were OK on cropped format may look decidedly less attractive when used on a full frame body. Secondly people will pixel peep 100%, make judgements and proclaim a lens good or bad without considering magnification factor or final print sizes. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
