on 2013-07-11 19:47 Aahz Maruch wrote
Congrats! Why not keep the 16-50?
i'm a little torn; i have the 16-45, which is good, if not great, yet i rarely use it any more; that range is covered for me by a set of small primes that are excellent and humble: A 50/1.7, FA 28/2.8 and DA 15/4 (i usually carry only one or two); together these three weigh less than the 16-50, but none of them is sealed
that and i'd like to recoup part of the cost; but i'll use the lens a bit first (i notice your email client turned my Unicode ellipsis into a question mark) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
