I use all of the limited number of AF points that Pentax provides. Eg: the two upper corners of the 9-square land nicely on eyes in portraits. The outliers are good for faces in full-body shots. Etc.
39 would be both good and bad. With the Pentax cluster, it takes only a moment to steer over to another point when switching poses or orientation. With 39? I dunno, could be tedious. OTOH, getting the framing you want rather than what's forced on you would be nice. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote: >> >> It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization. >> On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive. > > Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live > handheld shooting? > -- > Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ > <*> <*> <*> > Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
