Once you're into that sort of farting around with af points you are essentially focusing manually.
B On 24 Jul 2013, at 23:55, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > I use all of the limited number of AF points that Pentax provides. Eg: > the two upper corners of the 9-square land nicely on eyes in > portraits. The outliers are good for faces in full-body shots. Etc. > > 39 would be both good and bad. With the Pentax cluster, it takes only > a moment to steer over to another point when switching poses or > orientation. With 39? I dunno, could be tedious. OTOH, getting the > framing you want rather than what's forced on you would be nice. > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote: >>> >>> It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization. >>> On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive. >> >> Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live >> handheld shooting? >> -- >> Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ >> <*> <*> <*> >> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
