I cannot possibly recommend it enough. Gorgeous optic.
I'll second that!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Liberman" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: help wanted, doubts about 200mm by Pentax
Luiz, I have had two copies of F 70-210/4-5.6 (which I think is also ED
but such a marking is not present). This one:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/long/F70-210f4-5.6.html
I cannot possibly recommend it enough. Gorgeous optic.
On 8/5/2013 9:35 PM, luiz felipe wrote:
thanks P.J.
I had little luck with 70-210 by Takumar (M42) and Pentax, but probably
because both lenses were rather banged when I got them. used for a short
while a diff 70-210 sample that I remember as good, but being a borrowed
lens I never got to test it.
I'll be quickly testing the SMC-M next week, and probably I'll trade.
these nights I'll be testing the 80-320, the SMC Takumar 200mm/4 and
whatever other long lens I gather against a far wall with tiles and
street lamps. if possible, I'd test both 200mm with this scene, but
don't think this will be possible. we'll see...
lf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
