I wouldn't, plus it's got the extra reach and faster aperture when it's needed and it would allow me to offload my old A300/2.8. :)
On 1 September 2013 13:33, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 1 September 2013 13:18, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I spend a lot of time around shooters with top end Canon and Nikon cameras, >>> and I compete with them for space in newspapers and magazines. The K-5 >>> holds its own. More than holds its own. >> >> It really depends what you're doing of course. Lens selection sucks >> too, a friend just bought the new Sigma 120-300/2.8, it looks >> fantastic and would really be good for me but alas it's not built in >> Pentax mount :( >> >> http://www.sigmaphoto.com/product/120-300mm-f28-dg-os-hsm-s > > i'd be surprised if it could top the DA* 60-250/4. No many lenses can, > particularly at f4. > >> >> -- >> Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) >> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours >> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
