On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> My definition of "iconic" is identical to that of the U.S. Supreme > Court's definition of "pornography": I know it when I see it. > > As for that list, I found most of the color images to NOT be iconic. > And I think there was AT LEAST one huge omission: Where was the photo > of the lone guy standing in front of the tank in Tienanman Square? > Surely that one is "Top 25". The Tienanman Square pic is in the mix. I think it's 23 or 24. I didn't see a big split between color and BW in terms of what might be considered iconic, other than that some of the color pics are newer and can't really be said to have passed the test of time. (Clinton hugging Lewinsky, for example). But any such list is going to be highly subjective, and it was entertaining to see one editor's take on it. Paul > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> > wrote: >> http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/01/us/the-flag-iconic-images/index.html?hpt=hp_c2 >> >> Dan Matyola >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
