I did some IR work with the R-72 on an *istD as well. It was a nice 
combination. Now I have that very expensive filter sitting in a drawer. 

On Sep 14, 2013, at 9:44 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:

> I really liked the IR images that the *ist-D took. I mostly used an RM-90 
> filter (since I inherited oen - my father used to use it with Kodak HIE) but 
> I later used an R-72. Very long shutter speeds with the RM90, better with the 
> R-72. I now have an IR converted K-1)D, but I use it much less than I thought 
> I would. The *ist-D was nice iwth the filters, but the workflow was a PITA, 
> swapping on a filter that did not allow you to see your composition before 
> shooting.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 9/14/2013 10:45 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
>> camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
>> http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/cat49/
>> The only disadvantage is that you have longer shutter speeds so it
>> normally needs to be tripod mounted. Doing the conversion allow you to
>> handhold most IR exposures and use the camera's metering system.
>> 
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 9/14/2013 10:03, Darren Addy wrote:
>>>> Considering that Ann has an *ist D for sale right now, I thought this
>>>> post might be of interest.
>>>> Make her an offer quick before she decides to keep it and do this herself.
>>>> :)
>>> Zero chance of that - you would not be surprised to learn :-)
>>> 
>>> Thanks for posting this, Darren - maybe you got me a customer...
>>> 
>>> What I'd really like is someone who doesn't mind the green duct tape on the
>>> grip
>>> 
>>> ann
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> (PS.. *ist DL and DS are going from $119-125 on KEH, but they have NO
>>>> *ist D for some odd reason. That odd reason may be the link below.)
>>>> 
>>>> As you may recall, the *ist D sensor was much more sensitive to
>>>> infrared light even BEFORE removing the hot filter, so this makes it a
>>>> great camera to mod for IR. You can pay some place to do the
>>>> conversion, or you can follow these step-by-step instructions
>>>> yourself.
>>>> 
>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/vincenzomiceli/pentax--ist-d-ir-mod
>>>> 
>>>> If you need some inspiration, here is a portfolio from a guy who used
>>>> a converted *ist D
>>>> http://www.jrsphotos.com/lrg/portfolio/infrared/index.html
>>>> 
>>>> Another article on converting an *ist D
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.ephotozine.com/article/convert-your-digital-slr-to-infrared-8725
>>>> 
>>>> I got one myself, for this purpose, and it is one of the "yet to do"
>>>> projects on my list.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to