Yes. It's a no-win scenario these days. The brand enthusiasts complain, the videomongers complain, the still shooter traditionalists complain, and the anti-brand trolls complain too.
I'm so happy that most of my cameras are ancient junk that no one is complaining about. I just bought another Polaroid ... ;-) G On Oct 5, 2013, at 10:24 AM, David Parsons <[email protected]> wrote: > And if they did disable features based on camera model, people would > complain that the features are locked behind firmware. > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:59 PM, George Sinos <[email protected]> wrote: >> The number of advanced camera bodies sold probably doesn't financially >> justify producing one version with and one without video. The two >> would be made up of substantially the same parts. The software would >> be the major difference. >> >> You could say the same thing about many of the features in advanced >> camera bodies. Most of the features are only used by a small fraction >> of the users. But to any individual user, that particular feature may >> be indispensable. >> >> Pile up all of those features, slap on a poor interface, write a 350 >> page user manual that most people can't understand and call it a day. >> It makes a good after market for guys that teach or write alternative >> instruction manuals. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
