Xerox? You mustn't get around much, Attila. ;-) The service bureau where I get my printing done has a Canon digital press, a very popular system. It's the kind of machine that Blurb must use in their backend. It can do book binding with the right module add-on. The thing is enormous. You almost need a scooter to get from the one end to the the other. They only warm it up when there are a number of large jobs to run because it takes about 15 minutes just to turn it on.
My last office place had a Ricoh system, if I recall. A real beaut. On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Attila Boros <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 8:29 PM, mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just lost mine. First time I've ever bought a new lens that wasn't >> attached to a camera. > > Enjoy! > >> Allegedly, Pentax was specifically purchased to stuff Canon, >> the great rival in the office machine field. > > Canon in the office machine field? That's bit of a surprise for me. > Last time I worked in an office where we needed such things (not just > simple printers / faxes / all-in-ones) Xerox ruled supreme. > > >> Every corporate event he >> has attended has had high-level Japanese attendees with Pentaxes slung >> about their person, when they didn't have a GR attached. If correct, >> it appears to bode well for the future of the marque. Or badly for >> the future of Ricoh, if it has chosen its battle unwisely. > > Interesting. For home use I prefer Epson printers, it would be hard to > beat them. Though they might come out with some interesting > multifunctionals packing bang for buck. > > -- > Attila > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
