On 2 Nov 2013, at 13:09, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...]. I await the Mongol Horde of filter extremists and their flaming swords > ... Perhaps I'll offer them tea
...and a filter-tipped Camel > > Godfrey > > >> On Nov 2, 2013, at 4:00 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A 28/2.8 >> with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv filters >> [Tiffen] for use as lens protectors on two other lenses. When the order >> arrived I had two 67 mm flyers, one uv, one uv haze. >> >> My first thought was to return the haze, but reading up a little I thought >> maybe I’d keep it. In a discussion of uv vs. uv haze on photo.net, however, >> I encountered a diversity of opinions about filter vs. no filter and uv vs. >> haze, and strongly negative opinions about Tiffen. >> >> I’d be interested in this group’s thoughts. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
