I can hardly see how a sword can be made from a lens filter... At best
it can be turned to a shuriken...
On 11/2/2013 7:09 PM, Bob W wrote:
On 2 Nov 2013, at 13:09, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]. I await the Mongol Horde of filter extremists and their flaming swords
... Perhaps I'll offer them tea
...and a filter-tipped Camel
Godfrey
On Nov 2, 2013, at 4:00 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A 28/2.8
with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv filters [Tiffen]
for use as lens protectors on two other lenses. When the order arrived I had
two 67 mm flyers, one uv, one uv haze.
My first thought was to return the haze, but reading up a little I thought
maybe I’d keep it. In a discussion of uv vs. uv haze on photo.net, however, I
encountered a diversity of opinions about filter vs. no filter and uv vs. haze,
and strongly negative opinions about Tiffen.
I’d be interested in this group’s thoughts.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
