You've just cost me a lot of money Mr Robb.

On 5 November 2013 14:39, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With that in mind, I invite you to click the link below, for your viewing
> pleasure:
>
> WARNING: 12MP PAGE!!!!
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/k3k5/idonttestcameras.html
>
> Don't crank at me if your browser hocks a loogie.
>
> Anyway, it's fairly self explanatory.
> I had noise reduction set to off on both cameras.
> I downsized the 5% images by 50%, I downsized the K3 file to the same as the
> full K5 dimension, and then downsized it again by 50% to get the same
> length.
> The K3 image is a little taller than the K5 image.
> Images shot using a desk lamp for illumination, lens was the DFA 100/2.8
> macro at f/8.
> The focus was about a third of the way from the trim ring to the tip.
> I thought the K5 was pretty good at high ISO.
> The K3 doesn't have to worry about high ISO performance.
>
> What this set of images doesn't show, because it can't, is how much more of
> a pleasure to use the K3 is over the K5. Everything about the K3 is better
> in terms of usability. I'm super impressed with this camera so far.
>
> bill
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to