Paul Stenquist wrote: > >On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: >>>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>>> >>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... "Now, every frame is meaningful again." >>>>> >>>>> Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 >>>>> spent. >>>> >>>> Good point! If I shoot large format every frame will cost even more! >>>> Surely my photos will be better, right? >>> >>> Nope, just more meaningful. Of course it might just mean >>> that you are wasting both money and time. >> >> Shoot 8x10 Polaroid to find real meaning. ;-) > >I shot some 4x5 Polaroid with my Speed Graphic back in the '80s. Great fun. >Landscapes had a painterly look. Still have a polaroid back for a 4x5, but >don't think film is available. And if it were, I'm sure it would be costly.
Costly, yes. But really, really meaningful! -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
