On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:06:21AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > > >On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: > >>>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ... "Now, every frame is meaningful again." > >>>>> > >>>>> Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 > >>>>> spent. > >>>> > >>>> Good point! If I shoot large format every frame will cost even more! > >>>> Surely my photos will be better, right? > >>> > >>> Nope, just more meaningful. Of course it might just mean > >>> that you are wasting both money and time. > >> > >> Shoot 8x10 Polaroid to find real meaning. ;-) > > > >I shot some 4x5 Polaroid with my Speed Graphic back in the '80s. Great fun. > >Landscapes had a painterly look. Still have a polaroid back for a 4x5, but > >don't think film is available. And if it were, I'm sure it would be costly. > > Costly, yes. But really, really meaningful!
Somewhere around here I've got an 8x10 polaroid from 25+ years ago made on a digital film recorder connected to an Apollo workstation. (It's a ray-traced image I created while planning a kitchen remodel) CGI in-joke: There is a teapot sitting on the kitchen counter. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
