Lovely photo, a nice rendering. 

I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I 
spend a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is 
unimportant and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stuff 
more into the photo, whether it be levels or tones or gradients or whatever. 
This rendering you’ve used takes a moment and abstracts it into a photograph 
very nicely. It’s got a fine range of tones and colors in it, no more than 
necessary and not less. That’s what good rendering is all about. :-)

G


On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
> anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
> image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
> I really like.
> http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7db06303.htm


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to