Sure beats a lot of HDR I've seen and I would like it even without the
person in the photo.

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Mark Roberts
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>>I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I 
>>spend
>>a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is 
>>unimportant
>>and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stuff more into 
>>the photo,
>>whether it be levels or tones or gradients or whatever.
>
> Agreed. This is my attempt to rebel against the trends. :)
>
> Another note: This is one of those shots in which a passer by wandered
> into the scene and inadvertently improved the shot tremendously. I
> think without the person in there I wouldn't even have bothered
> working on the rendering – the shot would have gone straight into my
> "meh" bin.
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to