Its not you. The K-5 misses focus. I often focus and recompoe a couple of times to make sure I have a shot. Especially in low light. Stopping down gives a margin of error too.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19/11/2013 4:24 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> I grew to dislike the K-7. Hard to deal with the noise, even at ISO >> 400. Tonality was never a problem for me with the K-5. I usually >> tweak the image to display the pallet I want anyway. I didn't do a >> lot of studio shooting with the K-5, but I did do one major job, >> shooting about a dozen portraits each of a dozen consulting firm >> execs. I was surprised to see that I missed focus on four or five of >> the approximate 150 frames. It seemed inexplicable, but I attributed >> it to simple incompetence -- which may well have been the case. >> >> > The K7 was well nigh unusable above 400, but at base was as good as anything > out there. I was never fond of the coolness of the K5 files, when I tweaked > them to get a flesh tone I liked, something else was wrong. The colour of > the K3 seems closer to the rendering of the K7, which pleases me greatly. > Your focus problem was likely the same problem my K5 had, just not as > severe. > > > bill > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
