On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Bob W <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 Nov 2013, at 19:35, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Walt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/25/2013 1:22 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013, Walt wrote: >>>>> The question seems to boil down to why women and men are treated >>>>> differently as photographic subjects. Well, it's because they're >>>>> different. >>>> ...and why do you think they're different? >>> Because they're so easily distinguishable. >> >> And if they're not easily distinguishable, they could be transsexuals. I'm >> wondering: If we give equal "exposure" to male nudes, shouldn't we also give >> equal exposure to transsexuals? And maybe break that down into categories: >> per-op and post-op transsexuals? Male to female and female to male >> transsexuals? Hmmm. Equality sure can get complicated these days. > > That's the way equality is. It's not a question of 'us' 'giving' exposure to > anyone. Every adult is free to do whatever they damn well like providing they > don't infringe the same rights of others. Doesn't matter what their bits are > like - you don't have to look at them if you don't want to. All those people > are 'us'.
Of course. My tongue was firmly planted in cheek. Paul > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
