I shoot all four at 100. The Kodak 160NC seems to have the most accurate
skin tones, Kodak 160VC seems to be the most saturated. But these
observations are based only on subjective judgement of film shot at
different times. In any case, the Fuji offerings are very similar. To
me, the most important advantage of the Kodak film is that it dries with
less curl, so it's easier to scan.
Paul
Alan Chan wrote:
>
> Just wondering what's your opinions on these films, how they compared to
> each other? The Kodak web site said they should be rated at 160, is that
> really true? How about Fuji? I planned to do some portrait outdoor daylight
> and would like to know which to pick. Thx!
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
