On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Charles Robinson <charl...@visi.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2013, at 16:40 , Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: >>> >>> I don't shoot concerts often enough (and it's just for fun) to justify even >>> the used 50-135 at KEH for $500, even though I know that's a bargain for >>> that lens. >> >> Damn! KEH has a 50-135 for $500? !!! > > $546 actually. Sorry I exaggerated! > > There is also a Tamron AF 70-200 f/2.8 for $525. That would be right up my > alley, darn it. > > Maybe I just need to hypnotize the wife.
Just hypnotize the wife, Charles. Get her a new frock, some jewelry, whatever. You need the 50-135. Everything I shoot is just for fun really, besides the very odd paying gig, but I paid $800 for my DA*50-135 new a few years ago and I'd do it again. The results justify that glass. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
