On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > It's a very nice paper, similar to my eye to a double-weight Kodabromide F > surface without ferrotyping. Lots of depth, sharp and crisp. > > Yes, it's pricey. And it really has to dry down for at least 24 hours > otherwise the surface is very prone to scratching. But worth it for the right > subject matter. > > Godfrey >
What sort of subject matter do you find it best suited for? I've printed the same print (landscape) on three different papers, I and others have said they prefer the Epson, but I just can't explain why I prefer one over another. Like when I try to explain why I prefer one beer type over another. Not sure if it is a lack of appropriate vocabulary or lack of a discerning eye. In any case, I rely on others' recommendations for paper/subject fit, hoping to increase the chance that viewers will find a print pleasing to the eye. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
