I used it to print photo sets for owners of cars I shot for a magazine. Brilliant, rich color and a hefty sheet weight made for some impressive packages. But that was when the 13 x 19 sheets were going for less than two bucks per. I printed some BW portraits on it as well. Great rendering of greys with rich blacks.
Paul via phone > On Dec 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Stan Halpin <s...@stans-photography.info> wrote: > > >> On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >> It's a very nice paper, similar to my eye to a double-weight Kodabromide F >> surface without ferrotyping. Lots of depth, sharp and crisp. >> >> Yes, it's pricey. And it really has to dry down for at least 24 hours >> otherwise the surface is very prone to scratching. But worth it for the >> right subject matter. >> >> Godfrey > > What sort of subject matter do you find it best suited for? > > I've printed the same print (landscape) on three different papers, I and > others have said they prefer the Epson, but I just can't explain why I prefer > one over another. Like when I try to explain why I prefer one beer type over > another. Not sure if it is a lack of appropriate vocabulary or lack of a > discerning eye. In any case, I rely on others' recommendations for > paper/subject fit, hoping to increase the chance that viewers will find a > print pleasing to the eye. > > stan > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
