On 26/12/2013 5:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I'm curious, what is the appeal of the 20-40? Other than size, what
are the advantages of it over the 16-50? If the advantage is size,
how much smaller than the 16-50 is it?
I'm really asking myself that question right now. Don't get me wrong,
it's a gorgeous lens, and the short zoom range makes it like an extended
range standard lens, it's sharp and has nice bokeh..
The problem is it's big, and at 2/3 of a pound, it isn't light, though
it certainly isn't as heavy as it looks, and it's slow.
OTOH, it say Pentax on the bezel and for me that is generally enough. I
just turn off the rational part of my brain and let the bit that is
attracted to shiny things make the important decisions.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
