On Fri, Dec 27, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > That's quite a leap for someone who has apparently shot with neither > . The 16-50 renders beautifully and can achieve focus at close > range. For moderately small subjects like flowers or leaves I opt for > it in place of my macro.
The reason I went with the 100mm macro for my cruise instead of the 35mm macro was because during my test drive with the 16-50, I found myself constantly wishing for more macro, and by the time I switched over to the 35mm macro, I had to drastically shift my positioning to get the closeup I wanted. You can get reasonably close with the 16-50, but I really prefer true macro. -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
