On 28 Dec 2013, at 19:56, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ann, Bob: my tongue was firmly in my cheek when I commented about > places not to go. Well, half way, I guess. :-) But I think it's a > great topic, and it's been darned quiet 'round here of late. > > I realize that folks find new ways of seeing and presenting the > familiar all the time, and that is a worthy challenge in itself. > Reinterpreting the classics is a language, like writing new blues > tunes by plundering the old ones. > > I don't actually travel much myself, so I reinterpret what's around me > (flowers, cats, people) and I hope I can somehow do it with a fresh > PoV. Regardless, it's new to me, and that's good enough for now.
That's another great idea, to explore a place in depth. It's (sort of) one of the things I've been doing with the photos on my site of Greenwich. > >>> [...] >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker >>>> Sent: 28 December 2013 14:58 >>>> >>>> I interpret this handy heatmap as where _not_ to go ... >>>> >>>> http://www.sightsmap.com/ >> >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
