On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:25:14 -0500, Bolo wrote: >>I said: > >>I avoid 220 like the plague. > > >Why? Is there some problem with 220? People off-list have mentioned >that 220 is especially effective with 6x4.5. It allows a 645 shooter >to be as effective as a 35mm user with regards to film-on-tap. >Especially if you have some inserts loaded and ready to go. Combined >with modern 6x4.5 bodies it _seems_ a good combination.
It. is, I'm just being crotchety. - I don't like using 3 print file pages to hold a roll - I only have one body, but I like to switch films.....shooting 4 frames of 220 then scrapping the rest of the roll seems much more wasteful than with 220. - I don't have any 220 reels. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
