Pardon my lack of experience with NYC's topless laws; my family taught me to keep mine on in public. That said, the owners of the property really are a greedy bunch of witless of wonders.
Yonnie On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Attila Boros <[email protected]> wrote: > "The owners seek $1.1m (£670,000) in damages." > > No damage done at all. If anything, this will attract even more > visitors, women who want their photo taken in the same spot just like > that model (maybe not all of them topless). This is now a sensation / > free publicity / whatever, they should be happy about it. > > On the other hand, how the heck did they come up with that number? > Even if they supposed it to be an absolute top grade photo sold all > over the world, I doubt the photog could make $1.1m out of it. > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Steve Cottrell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Interesting! >> >> <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-25734917> >> >> -- >> >> >> Cheers, >> Cotty >> >> >> ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, >> || (O) | Web Video Production >> ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> >> _____________________________ >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
