But he did crop on rare occasions.
Probably cause he used the wrong lens!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "knarf" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Cardinal Pacelli and Saint Henri
I'm not surprised either.
Okay, I am about the no Leica part.
But he did crop on rare occasions. Such as this one:
http://www.magnumphotos.com/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&VBID=2K1HZOQAYYJDQN&SMLS=1&RW=980&RH=1409
I know he didn't often but obviously did if he had to.
Cheers,
frank
Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm really NOT surprised - but I can't remember why.
(along the line of it isn't the only theing he ever cropped,that is)
_Of course_ it is the perfect crop :-)
ann - worshipper at the alter of HCB
On 1/17/2014 16:46, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I am surprised!
Thanks for the info.
Perfect crop, by the way.
Bulent
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun
2014/1/17 Bob W <[email protected]>:
I gleaned a little-known factoid today from a book of essays about
HCB that I'm reading.
This famous photo:
http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/photographs/henri-cartier-bresson-cardinal-pacelli-in-montmarte-paris-5056800-details.aspx
which was taken in 1938, several years after H started using a
Leica, was shot with a glass-plate camera.
Not only that, but it is also very extensively cropped. The book
includes a print of the full negative, which I have photographed and
put here:
http://www.web-options.com/Pacelli.jpg
On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd say that's quite interesting.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
