On 21/01/2014 7:10 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well, if I can't succeed in getting Photoshop's HDR feature fixed I'll
buy a copy of Photomatix, which seems to work very well indeed.
In general it's faster and more versatile than Photoshop. With one
image I haven't been able to get the tonality I want the way I did
with Photoshop (when it worked) but that may just be part of the
learning curve I'll have to aspire towards - I've only been using
Photomatix for an afternoon, after all. For 99% of what I've tried
Photomatix is clearly better. And it's *much* faster. Looks like I'll
be spending the $99.00.
A friend of mine who is much into HDR has IIRC, three different HDR
programs. He says that not all images work the same in all programs.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
