Same for me K-x stopped me using the *ist D (permanently) and the
K20D, but later I bought 2 x K5 and sold everything else, the K-x was
a great little camera, the first camera on which I could really dial
up the ISO and feel like I wasn't ruining the shot.




On 20 February 2014 09:26, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Margus Männik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for a late reply,
>>
>> K30 is very un-noisy compared to K100D. I just took a look at my written 
>> reviews and sample images of both cameras. K30 images at ISO3200 are quite 
>> OK. K100D images do have visible digital noise and (depending on lighting 
>> conditions) may even have visible horizontal bands. There are also big 
>> differences in color accuracy and dynamic range.
>> I'd say that Pentax K-r was the first to have greatly improved image quality 
>> at high ISO values. And K30 is a bit better than K-r.
>
> K-x was the one that made the big leap.  When I got my K-x I nearly stopped 
> using my K20.  When I got my K-5 I kept the K-x and sold the K20.
>
> The K-r has some big functional advantages over the K-x, and a lot of small 
> performance advantages.
>
> But, anything made after the K-x will be a huge improvement over the K100.
>
>>
>> BR, Margus
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9.02.2014 4:16, Glen Berry wrote:
>>> This is going to be a difficult question to answer without showing 
>>> comparison images, but can anyone give me some sort of idea how noisy a 
>>> K-30 is, compared to the much older K-100D?
>>>
>>> One of the things that bugs me the most about the older cameras like the 
>>> K-100D, is the very noticeable noise at higher ISO's. With every step above 
>>> ISO 200, I can notice additional noise in the image. I think ISO 3200 is 
>>> horrible.
>>>
>>> I've read comments from folks who had much newer DSLR's of various brands, 
>>> and some of those folks seem content with ISO 3200 on THEIR camera, and I 
>>> think I've even read a few mentions of folks being satisfied with ISO 6400 
>>> for certain applications.
>>>
>>> So, how good is the K-30 with regards to high ISO noise, and try to compare 
>>> it to an older model like the K-100D if you can. I'm hoping the K-30 will 
>>> let me shoot a few stops higher ISO without sacrificing quality. Would that 
>>> likely be correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Glen
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to