I use vuescan. Once you create a workflow and calibrate colors properly things are easy. That you can scan into a DNG is very, very useful indeed. You can shoot a 25 color target with film, scan it, and then create a profile around that. It won't be the most accurate profile ever, but it will probably be good enough for non-reproduction work. The color workflow options in vuescan are very poorly laid out, but there's nothing else like it. How to adjust color and whatnot within vuescan itself is still very much a mystery to me. I find it better to just profile and take raw results off the scanner. I have an Epson that has a failing CCD element that makes nice lines through all the scans. At high res in vuescan they somehow disappear. It might have a noise reduction method, but it makes an otherwise useless scanner still very usable. I have not had much experience with scanning film with vuescan nor have I had much of a chance to test it out. I mostly scan small paintings and drawings and stitch if needed. The epson v500 I have has proven to be a workhorse that has mostly accurate colors once you remove the slight green cast. Profiling does wonders. A friend just developed a roll I gave to him a year ago, so I will be scanning some B&W with it. I have use the epson software to scan film, but it doesn't get colors right at all and they take some massaging and guesswork sometimes. I will try some slide film with vuescan as soon as I get my rolls developed. Its an amazing piece of software once you work it out. There's not much I wish it would do other than ICE. ICE is probably the reason I still use the epson software when it comes to film.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > The best way to scan with VueScan, for me anyway, is to output to its raw > format, encapsulating the raw files as DNG. ALL of the inversions (for negs), > color balances, gamma correction, etc, I do in Lightroom. I built a couple of > custom profiles to do the heavy lifting with Adobe DNG Profile Creator. > > The scanner is just acquiring the data, everything else is up to me. :-) > > G > > On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:06 PM, David Mann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 25, 2014, at 3:19 pm, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> not certain from your description, but if VueScan works with this scanner, >>> it's possible it could give you a more efficient workflow - might be worth >>> a shot with the demo >> >> I knew someone would recommend that. I tried the demo version again a few >> months ago and just ended up hating it again. Just couldn't get good >> results, the colours were all over the place and I wasn't able to easily >> correct them in Photoshop. It was a shame as I'd have been able to do my >> scanning using my Macbook Pro, which I can't with the Minolta software. >> It's PPC or Windows only, and Virtualbox doesn't support Firewire. >> >> For most slides the Minolta software is very efficient anyway, it's only >> this weird case I've just come across after about 8 or 9 years of owning it. >> Before now I don't think I've ever applied a negative exposure setting. It >> may be something about this old film. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
